GPUvsGPU / THE BENCH257 GPUs · recorded benchmarks

FOR THE LOVE OF THE UPGRADE

RTX 4070 Ti 12GB vs RX 9060 XT 8GB

RTX 4070 Ti 12GB leads this benchmark at 381 FPS, compared with 254 FPS for RX 9060 XT 8GB. That is a 127 FPS difference in GPUsed’s continuous 1080p FurMark workload.

Powered by GPUsed

01 / THE BENCH

GPU X

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB

GPU Y

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

QUICK PICKS257 models. Pick your next move.
GPU XBENCHMARK LEAD

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB

12GB GDDR6X

Benchmark FPS at 1080p

381FPS

Our rating /100
77.7/100
4070Tis we've tested
36

Historical total for this model.

Explore this GPU
GPU YON THE BENCH

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

8GB GDDR6

Benchmark FPS at 1080p

254FPS

Our rating /100
67.4/100
9060XTs we've tested
3

Historical total for this model.

Explore this GPU

RTX 4070 Ti 12GB records 381 FPS versus 254 FPS for RX 9060 XT 8GB. GPU Y is the percentage reference.

RECORDED BENCHMARKS

GPUsed’s recorded 1080p FurMark benchmark averages, not predicted gaming FPS. Quantities are GPUsed’s supplied historical model totals. Exact-model and shared-family historical totals are identified on each card; they are not the retained sample size of the displayed average.

THE MATCH-UP

RTX 4070 Ti 12GB vs RX 9060 XT 8GB: the context

The RTX 4070 Ti offers 12GB and leads the RX 9060 XT 8GB by 127 FPS in GPUsed’s workload. AMD lists a starting board power of 150 W for this 8GB Radeon, so a small-system buyer should confirm the PSU and cooling requirements of the GeForce before choosing the faster result.

The exact cards, at a glance

Memory, documented release and GPUsed editorial profiles for the two exact variants.
DetailRTX 4070 Ti 12GBRX 9060 XT 8GB
Memory12GB GDDR6X8GB GDDR6
Documented releasefirst documented retail availability. documented market.first documented retail availability. documented market.
GPUsed archetypeDivisiveDivisive
GPUsed Legend Rating Editorial legacy rating6.0 /103.3 /10
More about this GPURead the RTX 4070 Ti 12GB profile Read the RX 9060 XT 8GB profile

How to read this comparison

The benchmark is GPUsed’s continuous 1080p FurMark workload. The figures compare that workload, rather than predict FPS in a particular game. The percentage on the bench uses GPU Y as its reference: (GPU X FPS ÷ GPU Y FPS − 1) × 100. Swap the cards and the reference changes.

Our rating compresses the benchmark scale out of 100. It does not drive the percentage calculation. GPUsed’s historical quantities retain their model or shared-family labels; they are not the retained sample size of the displayed FPS average.

Read how the benchmark and ratings work

Another opponent?

Keep one card on the bench and see how the nearby choices compare.

Sources and checks

Figures and variant matching checked . GPUsed supplies the benchmark averages and historical quantities. The references below support the GPU identity and specification context.

The pair note comes from GPUsed’s reviewed comparison material, with current variant and numeric checks. Individual GPU profiles retain their own documented release qualifications and review dates.

02 / A DIFFERENT VIEW

Put the numbers in perspective.

XRTX 4070 Ti 12GB

381FPS

YRX 9060 XT 8GB

254FPS

Bars compare recorded benchmark FPS. GPU Y is the percentage reference.

03 / KEEP IT ON THE BENCH

Worth another look.

Your saved match-ups.
Saved on this device

Keep a match-up here. Pin the ones worth coming back to.

04 / UNDER THE HOOD

Geek out.
Get the context.

The right numbers are useful.
Knowing what they mean is better.

What are these FPS readings?

GPUsed’s recorded average benchmark results from continuous FurMark runs at 1080p. They compare graphics cards under this workload. A game’s settings, your CPU, ray tracing and upscaling can all change in-game performance.

All 257 selectable variants use GPUsed’s supplied results. The reported runs were at 1080p and typically lasted 30–60 minutes. We do not add test sessions or infer gaming frame rates from those results.

Why does swapping change the percentage?

GPU Y is the reference. We divide GPU X’s FPS by GPU Y’s FPS, subtract one and multiply by 100. A positive figure means X leads; a negative figure means Y leads. Swapping changes the reference, so it changes the percentage too.

What is our rating out of 100?

It is the existing compressed benchmark scale, with the fastest card in GPUsed’s dataset at 100. It gives older cards more room on the scale. The percentage difference is always calculated from FPS, never from the rating.

What do the model test counts tell me?

These are GPUsed’s supplied historical totals for each model or recorded model family. They are distinct from the retained sample size of a particular FPS average. They show GPUsed’s experience with each model; they do not tell you how many readings went into a particular FPS average.