GPUvsGPU / THE BENCH257 GPUs · recorded benchmarks

FOR THE LOVE OF THE UPGRADE

RX 6500 XT 8GB vs GTX 1060 3GB

RX 6500 XT 8GB leads this benchmark at 78 FPS, compared with 72 FPS for GTX 1060 3GB. That is a 6 FPS difference in GPUsed’s continuous 1080p FurMark workload.

Powered by GPUsed

01 / THE BENCH

GPU X

Radeon RX 6500 XT 8GB

GPU Y

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

QUICK PICKS257 models. Pick your next move.
GPU XBENCHMARK LEAD

Radeon RX 6500 XT 8GB

8GB VRAM

Benchmark FPS at 1080p

78FPS

Our rating /100
44.6/100
6500XTs we've tested
1

Historical total for this model.

Explore this GPU
GPU YON THE BENCH

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

3GB GDDR5

Benchmark FPS at 1080p

72FPS

Our rating /100
43.4/100
1060s we've tested
82

Historical total for this model.

Explore this GPU

RX 6500 XT 8GB records 78 FPS versus 72 FPS for GTX 1060 3GB. GPU Y is the percentage reference.

RECORDED BENCHMARKS

GPUsed’s recorded 1080p FurMark benchmark averages, not predicted gaming FPS. Quantities are GPUsed’s supplied historical model totals. Exact-model and shared-family historical totals are identified on each card; they are not the retained sample size of the displayed average.

THE MATCH-UP

RX 6500 XT 8GB vs GTX 1060 3GB: the context

The RX 6500 XT 8GB records 78 FPS against 72 FPS for the GTX 1060 3GB in GPUsed’s 1080p FurMark workload. The move gains 5 GB of capacity, while the difference in this test is 6 FPS. Before ordering the cited Sapphire 8 GB example, check that the system has the eight-pin power cable it requires.

The exact cards, at a glance

Memory, documented release and GPUsed editorial profiles for the two exact variants.
DetailRX 6500 XT 8GBGTX 1060 3GB
Memory8GB VRAM3GB GDDR5
Documented releasefirst documented retail availability. Sapphire PULSE 8 GB card offered for sale at $229.99 by 28 July 2022.first documented retail availability. documented market.
GPUsed archetypeDivisiveDivisive
GPUsed Legend Rating Editorial legacy rating3.6 /105.6 /10
More about this GPURead the RX 6500 XT 8GB profile Read the GTX 1060 3GB profile

How to read this comparison

The benchmark is GPUsed’s continuous 1080p FurMark workload. The figures compare that workload, rather than predict FPS in a particular game. The percentage on the bench uses GPU Y as its reference: (GPU X FPS ÷ GPU Y FPS − 1) × 100. Swap the cards and the reference changes.

Our rating compresses the benchmark scale out of 100. It does not drive the percentage calculation. GPUsed’s historical quantities retain their model or shared-family labels; they are not the retained sample size of the displayed FPS average.

Read how the benchmark and ratings work

Another opponent?

Keep one card on the bench and see how the nearby choices compare.

Sources and checks

Figures and variant matching checked . GPUsed supplies the benchmark averages and historical quantities. The references below support the GPU identity and specification context.

The pair note comes from GPUsed’s reviewed comparison material, with current variant and numeric checks. Individual GPU profiles retain their own documented release qualifications and review dates.

02 / A DIFFERENT VIEW

Put the numbers in perspective.

XRX 6500 XT 8GB

78FPS

YGTX 1060 3GB

72FPS

Bars compare recorded benchmark FPS. GPU Y is the percentage reference.

03 / KEEP IT ON THE BENCH

Worth another look.

Your saved match-ups.
Saved on this device

Keep a match-up here. Pin the ones worth coming back to.

04 / UNDER THE HOOD

Geek out.
Get the context.

The right numbers are useful.
Knowing what they mean is better.

What are these FPS readings?

GPUsed’s recorded average benchmark results from continuous FurMark runs at 1080p. They compare graphics cards under this workload. A game’s settings, your CPU, ray tracing and upscaling can all change in-game performance.

All 257 selectable variants use GPUsed’s supplied results. The reported runs were at 1080p and typically lasted 30–60 minutes. We do not add test sessions or infer gaming frame rates from those results.

Why does swapping change the percentage?

GPU Y is the reference. We divide GPU X’s FPS by GPU Y’s FPS, subtract one and multiply by 100. A positive figure means X leads; a negative figure means Y leads. Swapping changes the reference, so it changes the percentage too.

What is our rating out of 100?

It is the existing compressed benchmark scale, with the fastest card in GPUsed’s dataset at 100. It gives older cards more room on the scale. The percentage difference is always calculated from FPS, never from the rating.

What do the model test counts tell me?

These are GPUsed’s supplied historical totals for each model or recorded model family. They are distinct from the retained sample size of a particular FPS average. They show GPUsed’s experience with each model; they do not tell you how many readings went into a particular FPS average.