GPUvsGPU / THE BENCH257 GPUs · recorded benchmarks

FOR THE LOVE OF THE UPGRADE

RX 9070 XT 16GB vs RX 7900 GRE 16GB

RX 9070 XT 16GB leads this benchmark at 469 FPS, compared with 368 FPS for RX 7900 GRE 16GB. That is a 101 FPS difference in GPUsed’s continuous 1080p FurMark workload.

Powered by GPUsed

01 / THE BENCH

GPU X

Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB

GPU Y

Radeon RX 7900 GRE 16GB

QUICK PICKS257 models. Pick your next move.
GPU XBENCHMARK LEAD

Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB

16GB GDDR6

Benchmark FPS at 1080p

469FPS

Our rating /100
83.5/100
9070XTs we've tested
15

Historical total for this model.

Explore this GPU
GPU YON THE BENCH

Radeon RX 7900 GRE 16GB

16GB GDDR6

Benchmark FPS at 1080p

368FPS

Our rating /100
76.7/100
7900GREs we've tested
10

Historical total for this model.

Explore this GPU

RX 9070 XT 16GB records 469 FPS versus 368 FPS for RX 7900 GRE 16GB. GPU Y is the percentage reference.

RECORDED BENCHMARKS

GPUsed’s recorded 1080p FurMark benchmark averages, not predicted gaming FPS. Quantities are GPUsed’s supplied historical model totals. Exact-model and shared-family historical totals are identified on each card; they are not the retained sample size of the displayed average.

THE MATCH-UP

RX 9070 XT 16GB vs RX 7900 GRE 16GB: the context

RX 9070 XT 16GB leads RX 7900 GRE 16GB by 101 FPS in GPUsed’s continuous 1080p benchmark. Both are 16GB options. This comparison helps isolate the speed change in the measured workload. If your current card runs out of memory, compare a larger-capacity model before upgrading.

The exact cards, at a glance

Memory, documented release and GPUsed editorial profiles for the two exact variants.
DetailRX 9070 XT 16GBRX 7900 GRE 16GB
Memory16GB GDDR616GB GDDR6
Documented releasefirst documented retail availability. documented market.first documented retail availability. AMD reference RX 7900 GRE offered through Chinese retailer JD.com on 28 July 2023.
GPUsed archetypeFlagshipDivisive
GPUsed Legend Rating Editorial legacy rating5.9 /105.6 /10
More about this GPURead the RX 9070 XT 16GB profile Read the RX 7900 GRE 16GB profile

How to read this comparison

The benchmark is GPUsed’s continuous 1080p FurMark workload. The figures compare that workload, rather than predict FPS in a particular game. The percentage on the bench uses GPU Y as its reference: (GPU X FPS ÷ GPU Y FPS − 1) × 100. Swap the cards and the reference changes.

Our rating compresses the benchmark scale out of 100. It does not drive the percentage calculation. GPUsed’s historical quantities retain their model or shared-family labels; they are not the retained sample size of the displayed FPS average.

Read how the benchmark and ratings work

Another opponent?

Keep one card on the bench and see how the nearby choices compare.

Sources and checks

Figures and variant matching checked . GPUsed supplies the benchmark averages and historical quantities. The references below support the GPU identity and specification context.

The pair note comes from GPUsed’s reviewed comparison material, with current variant and numeric checks. Individual GPU profiles retain their own documented release qualifications and review dates.

02 / A DIFFERENT VIEW

Put the numbers in perspective.

XRX 9070 XT 16GB

469FPS

YRX 7900 GRE 16GB

368FPS

Bars compare recorded benchmark FPS. GPU Y is the percentage reference.

03 / KEEP IT ON THE BENCH

Worth another look.

Your saved match-ups.
Saved on this device

Keep a match-up here. Pin the ones worth coming back to.

04 / UNDER THE HOOD

Geek out.
Get the context.

The right numbers are useful.
Knowing what they mean is better.

What are these FPS readings?

GPUsed’s recorded average benchmark results from continuous FurMark runs at 1080p. They compare graphics cards under this workload. A game’s settings, your CPU, ray tracing and upscaling can all change in-game performance.

All 257 selectable variants use GPUsed’s supplied results. The reported runs were at 1080p and typically lasted 30–60 minutes. We do not add test sessions or infer gaming frame rates from those results.

Why does swapping change the percentage?

GPU Y is the reference. We divide GPU X’s FPS by GPU Y’s FPS, subtract one and multiply by 100. A positive figure means X leads; a negative figure means Y leads. Swapping changes the reference, so it changes the percentage too.

What is our rating out of 100?

It is the existing compressed benchmark scale, with the fastest card in GPUsed’s dataset at 100. It gives older cards more room on the scale. The percentage difference is always calculated from FPS, never from the rating.

What do the model test counts tell me?

These are GPUsed’s supplied historical totals for each model or recorded model family. They are distinct from the retained sample size of a particular FPS average. They show GPUsed’s experience with each model; they do not tell you how many readings went into a particular FPS average.